Lex Rex: Whether Neither Constitution Nor Designation of the King Is from the People

Lex Rex [Law Is King, or The Law & The Prince] (1644)Samuel Rutherford

Print |

Email |

Whether or No the Popish Prelate, the Aforesaid Author, Does by Force of Reason Evince That Neither Constitution Nor Designation of the King Is from the PeopleNOTES
   1. Antonin. de Dominis Archiepis. de dom. lib. 6, c. 2, n. 5, 6, seq.
   2. Quintius Curtius, lib. 5.
   3. Aug. de civ. Dei. lib. 16, c. 17.
   4. Hieron. in Hos. 2.
   5. Euseb. lib. 9, de prepar. Evan. c. 3.
   6. Clemems recog. lib. 4.
   7. Pirerius in Gen. 10:8, 9. diap. 3, a. 67. Illud quoque mihi fit percredible, Nimrod fuisse eundem, atque enim quem alii appellant Beluni patrem Nini
   8. Calvin Com. in Gen. 9.
   9. Euseb. prolog. 1 Chron.
   10. Paul Orosius, lib. l. de Ormesta mundl.
   11. Hieron. in traditio Hebrei in Gen.
   12. Tostat. Abulens, in Gen. 10:9.
   13. Josephus in Gen. 10.
   14. Luth. Com. ib.
   15. Calvin Com. Quanquam hoc loco non simpliciter fertur lex politica, ut plectantur homicide.
   16. Calvin in lect.
   17. Pirerius in Gen. 9:3, 4, n. 37. Vatablus has diverse interpretations: In homine, i.e. in conspectu omnium et publice, aut in homine, i.e. hominibus testincantibus: alii. in homine. i.e. propter hominem, quia occidit hominem. jussu magistratus. Cajetan expounds MdF)fb@f contra hominem, in despite of man.