1. Dig. 22. 2. De nautico foenore. Code 4. 33. Ibid. Emerigon, h. t. ch. 1. sec. 1. has collected all that the roman law had said on the subject. See also Lord Stowell, in the case of the Alexander, 1 Dodson's Adm. Rep. 278. The Augusta, ibid. 283. The Hero, 2 ibid. 139.
2.Busk v. Fearon, 4 East's Rep. 319.
3. Contrat la grosse, n. 1.
4. Emerigon, Traité des Contrats à la grosse, ch. 1. sec. 2.
5. Casaregis, dis. 62, n. 7. Guidon, ch. 19, sec. 10.
6.Ord. de la Mar. tit. des contracts à grosse aventure, art. 14. ibid. art. 3.
7. Code de Commerce, art. 317.
8. Condy's Marshall, vol. ii, 745.
9. 2 Blacks. Com. 459. Molloy, b. 2. ch. 10. sec. 13.
10.Soome v. Gleen, 1 Sid. Rep. 27.
11. Condy's Marshall, vol. ii. 741. b. c. Reade v. Com. Ins. Co., 3 Johns. Rep. 306. 1 Emerigon, tom. ii. 424, 436. Code de Commerce, art. 321.
12.La Ysabel. 1 Dodson's Rep. 273.
13.The Jane, 1 Dodson's Rep. 461. Emerigon, tom. ii. 434.
14. Boulay Paty, Cours. de droit com., tom. iii. 74-76, 167-169.
15.The Rhadamanthe, 1 Dodson's Rep. 204. The Betsey, ibid. 289. The Jerusalem, 2 Gallison's Rep. 350. Code de Commerce, art. 323.
16.The Sloop Mary, 1 Paine's Rep. 671.
17. Boulav Paty. tom. 3. 228, 232.
18.The Augusta, 1 Dodson's Rep. 283. The Jane, ibid. 461.
19. Guidon, ch 18. sec. 2. note, by Cleirac. Roccus, De Navibus, n. 51. Valin, tom. ii. 12. Appleton v. Crowninshield, 3 Mass. Rep. 443. Code de Commerce, art 347.
20.Insurance Company of Pennsylvania v. Duval, 8 Serg. & Rawle, 138. By the Code de Commerce, art. 380, the lender, on bottomry, and respondentia, is also chargeable for general and for particular average.
21.Thompson v. The Royal Exchange Assurance Company, 1 Maule & Selw. 30.
22. Parker, J., and Sewall, J., in Appleton v. Crowninshield, 3 Mass. Rep. 448. Wilmer v. Smilax, 2 Peters' Adm. Rep. 295, note. Valin's Com. tom. ii. 12. Code de Commerce, art. 327. Magens on Insurance' vol. ii. 52. 56. 196-8. 430. Emerigon, tom. ii. 544. 547. Phillips on Insurance, 301.
23.Joyce v. Wiliamson, and Walpole v. Ewer. —Park on Ins. 6th edit. 563. 565.
24. See Condy's Marshall, vol. ii. 760, 761. Phillips on Ins. 301, 2.
25. Ord. de la Mar. h. t. art. 16. Code, art. 330. Emerigon, Traité des Contrats à la grosse, ch. 7. sec. 1.
26. Roccus, De Navibus, n. 51. Western v. Wildy, Skinner, 152. Ord. de la Mar. tit. Contrats à la grosse, art. 12. Emerigon, tom. ii. 509-512. Code de Commerce, art. 326.
27. Condy's Marshall, vol. ii. 753-758. Boulay Paty, tom. 3. 158-164, 171-176. Ibid. 192.
28. 3 Johns Rep. 352.
29.The Alexander, 1 Dodson, 178. The Hero, 2 ibid. 139.
30.The Sloop Mary, 1 Paine's Rep. 671.
31. Valin's Com. tom. i. 366. Emerigon, tom. ii. 484. Condy's Marshall, vol. ii. 747, a.
32.Conard v. The Atlantic Ins. Co., 1 Peters' Rep. 386.
33. Emerigon, t. 2. 414. M. Pardessus, Cours de Droit Commer. t. ii. 273. Boulay Paly. t. iii. 80-89. The French law declares, and it is also the doctrine of Casaregis, that a bottomry contract, if made payable to order, or bearer, is negotiable like a bill of exchange, and is to be dealt with and protested in like manner. Casaregis, disc. 55. Boulay Paty, tom iii. 97. Code de Commerce, art. 313.
34. Code de Commerce, art. 319.
35. 1 Dodson, 277, 283. The Ship Packet, 3 Mason, 255.
36. Pothier, Traité du Pret a la Grosse, n. 19. See, for further in formation on the subject of maritime loans, Emerigon's Essay on Maritime Loans, which is the most complete treatise extant on the subject. The substance of it has been ably incorporated into the work of M. Boulay Paty, on a Course of Maritime Commercial Law, and it has been closely and accurately translated by John S. Hall, Esq. of Baltimore.
