| 
1. Reeve's Hist. of the English .Law, vol. iii. p. 15. 369.
2. Co. Litt. 118. b.
3. Co. Litt. 46. a. Case of Gay, 5 Mass. Rep. 419. Brewster v. Hill, 1 N.H. Rep. 350.
4. Lord Coke said, that charters, or muniments of title, might be entailed. Co. Litt. 20. a.
5. Co. Litt. 8. a.
6. Poole's case, 1 Salk. 368.
7. Ex parte Quincy,1 Atk. 477.
8. Holmes v. Tremper, 20 Johns. Rep. 29.
9. Naylor v. Collinge, 1 Taunton, 21.
10. The King v. Londenthorpe, 6 Term Rep. 377.
11. Cresson v. Stout, 17 Johns. Rep. 116.
12. Reynolds v. Shuter, 5 Cowen, 323.
13. Goddard v. Chase, 7 Mass. Rep 432.
14. Taylor v. Townsend, 9 Mass. Rep. 411.
15. 3 East, 38.
16. Miller v. Plumb, 6 Cowen, 665.
17. Taylor's Elem. of the Civil Law, p. 475
18. Inst. 2. 1. 1.
19. 9 Co. 58. b. Aldred's case.
20. 7 Co. 16- 18. Finch's Law, 176.
21. Buffon's Natural History, vol. vii. Smellie's ed.
22. Grotius, Hist. De Belg. lib. 5. cited in Puf. Droit de la Nat. 1. 4, ch. 6. s. 5.
23. Liv. 4. ch. 6. s. 5.
24. 3 Caines' Rep. 175.
25. 20 Johns. Rep. 75.
26. Inst. 2. 1. 13. Dig . 41. 1. 5. 2.
27. Inst. 2. 1. 11.
28. Gillet v. Mason, 7 Johns. Rep. 16.
29. Inst. 2. 1. 14. Wallis v. Mease, 3 Binney, 546.
30. Co. Litt.152. a.
31. Co. Litt. 182. a. Noy's Rep. 55. Jeffereys v. Small, 1 Vern. 217. Elliot v. Brown, cited in Rathby's note to 1 Vern. 217.
32. Best, J. in Barton v. Williams, 5 Barn. & Ald. 395. If this dictum be not confined to joint tenancy in merchandise, where it undoubtedly applies, it must at least be restricted to chattel interests, and there it has some color from what Lord Coke says in Co. Litt. 185. a. A joint tenant of an estate in fee can only convey his part, and if he should levy a fine of the whole estate, or convey it by bargain and sale, it would only reach his interest, and amount to a severance of the joint tenancy. Co. Litt. 186. a. Ford v. Lord Grey, 6 Mod. 43. 1 Salk. 286.
33. Perkins v. Baynton, 1 Bro. 118.
34. 4 Cro. 15.
35. Motley v. Bird, 3 Vesey, 628. Crooke v. De Vandes, 9 Vesey, 197. Jackson v. Jackson, ibid. 591.
36. Manning's case, 8 Co. 95. Lampett's case, 10 Co. 46. Child v. Baylie, Cro. J. 459.
37. 2 Blacks. Com. 298. The cases which I have seen all arose upon wills; but in Child v. Baylie, Cro. J. 459 the court speaks of such a remainder as being created equally by grant or devise.
38. 37 H. 6. abridged in Bro. tit. Devise, pl. 13. Hastings v. Douglass, Cro. C. 343.
39. Smith v. Clever, 2 Vern. 59. Hyde v. Parralt, 1 P. Wms. 1. Tissen v. Tissen, ibid. 500. Pleydell v. Pleydell, ibid. 748. Porter v. Tournay, 3 Vesey, 311. Randall v. Russell, 3 Merivale, 190.
40. Moffat v. Strong, 10 Johns. Rep. 12. Westcott v. Cady, 5 Johns, Ch. Rep. 334. Griggs v. Dodge, 2 Day's Rep. 28. Taber v. Packwood, ibid. 52. Scott v. Price, 2 Serg. & Rawl. 59. Deihl v. King, 6 ibid 29. Reyall v. Eppes, 2 Munf. 479. Mortimer v. Moffatt, 4 H.& Munf. 503. Logan v. Ladson, 1 S. C. Eq. Rep. 271.
41. Randall v. Russell, 3 Merivale, 194.
42. Dyer, 7. p1. 8.
43. Seale v. Seale, 1 P. Wms. 290. Chandless v. Price, 3 Vesey. 99. Brouncker v. Bagot, 1 Merivale, 271. Tothill v. Pitt, Maddock's Ch. Rep. 433. Garth v. Baldwin, 2 Vesey, 646.
44. 2 Freeman, 206, case 280.
45. Foley v. Burnett, 1 Bro. 279.
46. Fearne's Executory Devises, vol. ii. 35. 4th edit. by Powel. Mortimer v. Moffatt, 4 H. & Munf. 503.