James Kent's Commentaries: Of the Concurrent Jurisdiction of the State Governments

LONANG Library

• Historic Reference

• Organic Documents

LONANG Commentaries

• Legal Foundations

• Constitutional Law

• LONANG Curriculum

Tribunal of Justice

LONANG Institute

• Search Our Site

• About Us

• Contact Us

• Home

*New!*
Reassert the Rule of Law
Reform Civil Government
Reclaim The Church

* NOW - Vols. 1 - 4 are available for purchase! Click here * Of the Concurrent Jurisdiction of the State GovernmentsNOTES
   1. No. 32.
   2. 3 Dallas, 386.
   3. 4 Wheaton, 193.
   4. 5 Wheaton, 1.
   5. 9 Johnson's Rep. 507.
   6. 9 Johnson's Rep. p. 576.
   7. 3 Serg. & Rawl. 179.
   8. No. 32. See also No. 31, 33, 34.
   9. Debates in the New York Convention, printed by Francis Childs, p. 113.
   10. 2 Cranch, 397.
   11. 10 Wheaton, l.
   12. 1 Wheatun, 304.
   13. 5 Wheaton, 1.
   14. 9 Johns. Rep. 239.
   15. 10 Johns. Rep. 328.
   16. Case of Lockington, before Tilghman. Chief Justice of Pennsylvania, November, 1813, 5 Hall's Law Journal, 92. Same case, 5 Hall's Law Journal, 301-330. A similar case in Maryland, 5 Hall's Law Journal, 486, and in South Carolina, 5 Hall's Law Journal, 497. Commonwealth v. Harrison, 11 Mass Rep. 68. Case of Joseph Almeida in Maryland, and the case of Pool and others in Virginia, cited in Sergeant's Constitutional Law, p. 279, 280.
   17. 14 Johnson's Rep. 95.
   18. 17 Johnson, 4.
   19. 6 Hall's Law Journal, 113.
   20. Sergeant's Const. Law, p. 272.
   21. Ex parte Pool.
   22. Sergeant's Const. Law, p. 272. 274.